r00t2/bdisk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Activity

err.. booting's broken?

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
brent s.
2016-12-19 04:56:18 -05:00
parent d6f76dbfdc
commit 2187d7ac55
9 changed files with 98 additions and 24 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

74
docs/manual/faq/ALTERNATIVES.adoc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
== I don't like BDisk. Are there any other alternatives?
First, I'm sorry to hear that BDisk doesn't suit your needs. If you want any features you think are missing or encounter any bugs, please report them!
But yes; there are plenty of alternatives!
NOTE: Only *currently maintained projects* are listed here.
=== https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/archboot[Archboot]
Written in Bash
[frame="topbot",options="header,footer"]
|======================
|Pros|Cons
|Highly featureful|Arch-only live media
|Includes an assisted Arch install script|Inaccessible to non-Arch users
|Can create tarballs too|Not very customizable by default
|Supports hybrid ISOs|Infrequent stable releases
|Supports PXE-booting infrastructure|Requires a systemd build host
|Supports SecureBoot|Not a secure setup by default
|Supports GRUB2's "ISO-loopback" mode|Builds a much larger image
|Official Arch project|Some graphical bugs
||Much more disk space is necessary for the tool itself
||*Only* runs in RAM, so not ideal for RAM-constrained systems
||Based on/requires an Arch build host
||Requires an x86_64 build host
||Has a large amount of dependencies
||Manual intervention required for build process
||Minimal documentation
||
|======================
=== https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/archiso[Archiso]
Written in Bash.
[frame="topbot",options="header,footer"]
|======================
|Pros|Cons
|Used to build the official Arch ISO|Requires an x86_64 build host
|Supports custom local on-disk repositories|Not very featureful as far as customization goes
|Supports arbitrary file placement in finished image|Requires an Arch build host
|Supports hybrid ISOs|Has odd quirks with package selection
|Supports Secureboot|Manual intervention required for build process
|Official Arch project|Does not start networking by default
|Can run in RAM or from media|Very minimal environment
||Arch-only live meda
||Documentation is lacking
||
|======================
=== Debian's https://wiki.debian.org/Simple-CDD[Simple-CDD]
Written in Bash.
[frame="topbot",options="header,footer"]
|======================
|Pros|Cons
||
||
|======================
=== Fedora's https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD[Livemedia-creator]
Written in Bash.
[frame="topbot",options="header,footer"]
|======================
|Pros|Cons
||
||
|======================
=== https://github.com/rhinstaller/livecd-tools[LiveCD Tools]
Written in Bash.
[frame="topbot",options="header,footer"]
|======================
|Pros|Cons
||
||
|======================

3
docs/manual/faq/INDEX.adoc
View File

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
include::WHYARCH.adoc[]
include::ALTERNATIVES.adoc[]

4
docs/manual/faq/WHYARCH.adoc
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
== Why Arch Linux?
Because it's a very easy-to-use, simple, https://wiki.archlinux.org/[well-documented] distro. It's no-frills and incredibly flexible/customizable, and can be made rather slim (and is out of the box, in fact). It's also very friendly to run as a chroot inside any other distro or as a chroot host to any other distro.
Plus they have tarballs all ready for chroot easily accessible.
Plus they release monthly tarball snapshots that are fairly small and create quick bootstrap environments.